1. 网页内容摘要

这个网页是百度百科关于《最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定》的词条页面。该决定由中华人民共和国最高人民法院于2020年12月29日发布，自2021年1月1日起施行。该决定是为了切实实施《中华人民共和国民法典》，保证国家法律统一正确适用而制定的。

页面主要包含了该决定的基本信息，如发布时间、实施时间、发文字号(法释〔2020〕16号)等。决定内容显示，最高人民法院决定废止《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》等116件司法解释及相关规范性文件。

页面还列出了部分被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件目录，包括文件标题、发文日期及文号等信息。这些被废止的文件包括《最高人民法院关于人民法院司法统计工作的若干规定》、《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》、《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国物权法〉若干问题的解释（一）》等多项司法解释和规范性文件。

2. 与问题相关的信息提取

《最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定》是最高人民法院于2020年12月29日发布的一项重要决定，文号为法释〔2020〕16号。该决定于2021年1月1日起施行。

该决定的制定背景是为了切实实施《中华人民共和国民法典》，保证国家法律统一正确适用。根据《中华人民共和国民法典》等法律规定，结合审判实际，最高人民法院决定废止116件司法解释及相关规范性文件。

决定废止的部分司法解释及相关规范性文件包括：

1. 《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》
2. 《最高人民法院印发〈关于贯彻执行〈中华人民共和国民法通则〉若干问题的意见（试行）〉的通知》
3. 《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国物权法〉若干问题的解释（一）》
4. 《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国担保法〉若干问题的解释》
5. 《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释（一）》
6. 《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释（二）》

这些被废止的司法解释和规范性文件涉及民法总则、民法通则、物权法、担保法、合同法等多个法律领域，表明最高人民法院在民法典实施前对相关司法解释进行了全面清理。

3. 相关网页链接

1. 最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释 - 被废止的司法解释

2. 最高人民法院印发〈关于贯彻执行〈中华人民共和国民法通则〉若干问题的意见（试行）〉的通知 - 被废止的司法解释

3. 最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国物权法〉若干问题的解释（一） - 被废止的司法解释

4. 最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国担保法〉若干问题的解释 - 被废止的司法解释

5. 最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释（二） - 被废止的司法解释

6. 中华人民共和国民法典 - 相关法律

7. 中华人民共和国最高人民法院 - 发布机构

8. 会计师事务所为企业出具虚假验资证明应如何承担责任问题的批复 - 被废止的司法解释

9. 逾期付款违约金应当按照何种标准计算问题的批复 - 被废止的司法解释

10. 修改《最高人民法院关于逾期付款违约金应当按照何种标准计算问题的批复》的批复 - 被废止的司法解释

4. 相关图片

1. 标题: 百度百科
   内容: 百度百科logo
   来源: 百度百科
   链接: https://baikebcs.bdimg.com/baike-react/common/logo-baike.svg

2. 标题: 百度百科
   内容: 百度百科logo(重复)
   来源: 百度百科
   链接: https://baikebcs.bdimg.com/baike-react/common/logo-baike.svg

1. 网页内容摘要

该网页展示了《最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定》(法释〔2020〕16号)的全文内容。该决定于2020年12月23日由最高人民法院审判委员会第1823次会议通过，并于2020年12月29日公布，自2021年1月1日起施行。

决定的主要目的是为了切实实施《中华人民共和国民法典》，保证国家法律统一正确适用。根据《中华人民共和国民法典》等法律规定，结合审判实际，最高人民法院决定废止《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》等116件司法解释及相关规范性文件。

网页包含了决定的正文以及附后的被废止文件目录，这些目录以图片形式展示，列出了全部116件被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件的名称。这一决定是为配合民法典实施而进行的司法解释清理工作，确保法律体系的一致性和有效实施。

2. 与问题相关的信息提取

该网页内容是关于最高人民法院废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定。具体信息如下：

1. 文件名称：《最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定》
2. 文件编号：法释〔2020〕16号
3. 通过时间：2020年12月23日由最高人民法院审判委员会第1823次会议通过
4. 公布时间：2020年12月29日
5. 施行时间：2021年1月1日

决定的主要内容是为了配合《中华人民共和国民法典》的实施，保证国家法律统一正确适用，最高人民法院决定废止《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》等116件司法解释及相关规范性文件。

网页中包含了被废止的116件司法解释及相关规范性文件的完整目录，这些目录以图片形式展示。这一决定是民法典实施前的司法解释清理工作，目的是消除可能与民法典产生冲突的旧有司法解释，确保法律体系的一致性。

3. 相关网页链接

1. 最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定 - 本文件的主链接
2. 中华人民共和国民法典 - 决定中提到的作为废止依据的法律
3. 最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释 - 被废止的司法解释之一
4. 法释关键词搜索
5. 最高人民法院关键词搜索
6. 废止关键词搜索
7. 司法解释关键词搜索
8. 规范性文件关键词搜索
9. 决定关键词搜索
10. 捐赠链接

4. 相关图片提取

1. 图片标题：废止司法解释及相关规范性文件目录（第1页）
   内容：列出了部分被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件名称
   来源：最高人民法院
   链接：http://www.court.gov.cn/upload/image/2020/12/30/13/57/20201230135743_76477.jpg

2. 图片标题：废止司法解释及相关规范性文件目录（第2页）
   内容：列出了部分被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件名称
   来源：最高人民法院
   链接：http://www.court.gov.cn/upload/image/2020/12/30/13/57/20201230135744_54886.jpg

3. 图片标题：废止司法解释及相关规范性文件目录（第3页）
   内容：列出了部分被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件名称
   来源：最高人民法院
   链接：http://www.court.gov.cn/upload/image/2020/12/30/13/57/20201230135744_33105.jpg

4. 图片标题：废止司法解释及相关规范性文件目录（第4页）
   内容：列出了部分被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件名称
   来源：最高人民法院
   链接：http://www.court.gov.cn/upload/image/2020/12/30/13/57/20201230135745_54263.jpg

5. 图片标题：废止司法解释及相关规范性文件目录（第5页）
   内容：列出了部分被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件名称
   来源：最高人民法院
   链接：http://www.court.gov.cn/upload/image/2020/12/30/13/57/20201230135745_36071.jpg

6. 图片标题：废止司法解释及相关规范性文件目录（第6页）
   内容：列出了部分被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件名称
   来源：最高人民法院
   链接：http://www.court.gov.cn/upload/image/2020/12/30/13/57/20201230135746_40898.jpg

7. 图片标题：废止司法解释及相关规范性文件目录（第7页）
   内容：列出了部分被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件名称
   来源：最高人民法院
   链接：http://www.court.gov.cn/upload/image/2020/12/30/13/57/20201230135746_79001.jpg

8. 图片标题：废止司法解释及相关规范性文件目录（第8页）
   内容：列出了部分被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件名称
   来源：最高人民法院
   链接：http://www.court.gov.cn/upload/image/2020/12/30/13/57/20201230135747_34075.jpg

I notice that the URL provided points to a PDF file from the Postal Savings Bank of China (PSBC), but no actual content is displayed in the markdown section. The PDF appears to be from the Heilongjiang branch of PSBC (based on the URL path "hljsfh"), dated January 2022, but I cannot access or view the content of this PDF to analyze it.

Since no webpage content is available for analysis, I cannot:

1. Write a summary of the content
2. Extract information related to your question
3. Identify relevant webpage links
4. Extract images from the webpage

To properly analyze this content, you would need to either:

1. Provide the actual text content of the PDF
2. Convert the PDF to a readable format
3. Share a different URL where the content is accessible as HTML rather than PDF

If you'd like me to analyze this document, please provide the content in a readable format, and I'll be happy to help with your query.

Summary

The webpage appears to be a footer or copyright section of a website belonging to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of China. It contains minimal content, including a copyright notice stating that all rights are reserved by the Office of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. The page provides a contact email (flk@npc.gov.cn) and browser compatibility recommendations, suggesting users access the site using Google Chrome 65.0, Firefox 47.0, IE10, or higher versions for optimal browsing experience. The content is presented in Chinese and appears to be standard website footer information.

Information Related to the Question

No content related to the question, as no specific question was provided in the query.

Relevant Webpage Links

No links were identified in the provided webpage content.

Relevant Images

No images were identified in the provided webpage content.

最高人民法院司法解释和批复汇编页面摘要

该网页展示了最高人民法院发布的一系列司法解释、批复和规定，编号从56至116，共计61项法律文件。这些文件涵盖了从1982年至2013年间发布的各类司法解释，内容涉及民事、经济、劳动争议、专利、商标、仲裁、诉讼程序等多个法律领域。每项文件均标明了标题、发布日期和文号。这些司法解释和批复是对中国法律适用问题的权威解释，为法院审理案件提供了具体指导。页面底部显示这是第2页，共2页，并附有免责声明，表明内容转载自政府网站、政报等公开出版物。

最高人民法院司法解释相关信息

该网页展示了最高人民法院发布的多项司法解释、批复和规定，主要包括以下几类内容：

1. 民事责任相关解释：包括破产清算组民事纠纷案件管辖、信用社退汇责任、出借银行账户责任、金融机构验资责任、交通事故损害赔偿等多项解释。

2. 劳动争议解释系列：包括《关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(一)至(四)，分别于2001年、2006年、2010年和2013年发布，形成了完整的劳动争议审理法律适用体系。

3. 知识产权保护：包括专利侵权诉讼、诉前停止侵犯专利权行为、诉前停止侵犯注册商标专用权等解释。

4. 诉讼程序相关解释：涉及案件管辖、诉讼主体资格、督促程序、诉前保全措施、司法文书送达等程序性问题的解释。

5. 仲裁相关解释：包括仲裁裁决执行、仲裁协议效力异议管辖等内容。

6. 司法赔偿解释：关于民事、行政诉讼中司法赔偿若干问题的解释。

这些司法解释按照编号顺序排列，每项均标明了具体发布日期和文号，是人民法院审理相关案件的重要法律依据。

相关网页链接

1. 最高人民法院 - 链接到最高人民法院发布的法律文件汇编
2. 不分页显示 - 可查看所有内容不分页显示
3. 第1页 - 查看第1页内容
4. 上一页 - 返回上一页
5. 更多联系 - 网站联系方式

相关图片

无相关图片可提取。

1. 网页内容摘要

该网页展示了最高人民法院于2020年12月29日发布的《关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定》(法释〔2020〕16号)。该决定由最高人民法院审判委员会第1823次会议于2020年12月23日通过，自2021年1月1日起施行。决定的主要目的是为了切实实施民法典，保证国家法律统一正确适用。

文件内容包括决定正文和附录目录，列出了被废止的116件司法解释及相关规范性文件。网页显示了其中的55项，包括各种司法解释、批复、通知和意见等。这些被废止的文件涉及多个法律领域，包括民法总则、物权法、担保法、合同法、婚姻法、继承法等。每项被废止的文件都标明了序号、标题、发文日期及文号。

这一决定的出台是为了配合《中华人民共和国民法典》的实施，对不再适用的司法解释和规范性文件进行清理，以确保法律体系的统一性和一致性。

2. 与最高人民法院废止司法解释相关的信息

最高人民法院于2020年12月29日发布了《关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定》(法释〔2020〕16号)，该决定由最高人民法院审判委员会第1823次会议于2020年12月23日通过，自2021年1月1日起施行。

决定的主要目的是为了切实实施民法典，保证国家法律统一正确适用。根据《中华人民共和国民法典》等法律规定，结合审判实际，最高人民法院决定废止《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》等116件司法解释及相关规范性文件。

被废止的文件包括多种类型：

1. 司法解释，如《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》
2. 批复，如《最高人民法院关于建设工程价款优先受偿权问题的批复》
3. 通知，如《最高人民法院关于学习宣传贯彻《中华人民共和国未成年人保护法》的通知》
4. 意见，如《最高人民法院关于贯彻执行《中华人民共和国民法通则》若干问题的意见（试行）》

这些被废止的文件涵盖了多个法律领域：

• 民法总则相关解释
• 物权法相关解释
• 担保法相关解释
• 合同法相关解释
• 婚姻法相关解释
• 继承法相关解释
• 破产清算相关规定
• 名誉权相关解释

此次废止大量司法解释和规范性文件，是为了配合2021年1月1日《中华人民共和国民法典》的正式实施，清理与民法典不一致或被民法典整合的旧有规定，确保法律适用的统一性和权威性。

3. 相关网页链接

1. 最高人民法院 - 链接到最高人民法院发布的法规文件列表
2. 不分页显示 - 查看该文件的完整不分页版本
3. 下一页 - 查看该文件的第二页内容
4. [2] - 跳转到第二页
5. 更多联系 - 网站联系方式页面
6. law-lib.com - 法律图书馆网站主页

4. 相关图片

网页中没有与问题相关的图片。

5. 多语言支持

根据您的输入语言为中文，我已提供中文回复。

最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定（附目录）

1. 内容摘要

该网页内容是最高人民法院于2020年12月29日发布的关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定。该决定于2020年12月23日由最高人民法院审判委员会第1823次会议通过，自2021年1月1日起施行。决定指出，为切实实施民法典，保证国家法律统一正确适用，根据《中华人民共和国民法典》等法律规定，结合审判实际，决定废止《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》等116件司法解释及相关规范性文件。

文件主体部分附有详细目录，列出了被废止的116件司法解释及相关规范性文件的序号、标题、发文日期及文号。这些被废止的文件涉及多个法律领域，包括民法总则、物权法、担保法、合同法、婚姻法、继承法、劳动争议、专利法、民事诉讼法等方面的司法解释和规范性文件，时间跨度从1982年至2018年。

2. 与民法典实施相关的信息

该决定与民法典实施密切相关。决定明确指出废止这些司法解释和规范性文件的目的是"为切实实施民法典，保证国家法律统一正确适用"。被废止的文件包括与民法典各编相关的司法解释，如民法总则、物权法、合同法、婚姻法、继承法等方面的司法解释，这表明最高人民法院正在清理与民法典实施可能产生冲突的司法解释，为民法典的全面实施扫清障碍。

被废止的文件中包括《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》、《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国物权法〉若干问题的解释（一）》、《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国担保法〉若干问题的解释》、《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释（一）》、《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国婚姻法〉若干问题的解释（一）》等一系列与民法典各编相关的重要司法解释，这些文件的废止标志着司法实践将全面转向适用民法典的新阶段。

3. 相关网页链接

无相关网页链接。

4. 相关图片

无相关图片。

Summary of the Webpage Content

This webpage presents the "Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Certain Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents," which was adopted at the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 23, 2020, and implemented from January 1, 2021. The decision aims to effectively implement the Civil Code of China and ensure the unified and correct application of national laws.

The document announces the abolition of 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents, including "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Statute of Limitations System in the General Provisions of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China" and others. The main body of the document is followed by a comprehensive catalog listing all 116 abolished documents, organized by serial number, title, and issuance date/document number.

The abolished documents cover various legal areas including contract law, property rights, marriage and family law, inheritance law, labor disputes, intellectual property, civil procedure, and judicial administration. Many of these documents were issued between the 1980s and 2010s and have become obsolete with the implementation of the Civil Code, which unified and updated China's civil law system.

Information Related to the Question

The webpage contains a comprehensive list of judicial interpretations and normative documents that were abolished by the Supreme People's Court of China. The decision was made to effectively implement the Civil Code of China and ensure unified and correct application of national laws.

Key information includes:

1. The decision was adopted on December 23, 2020, at the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court.
2. The decision came into effect on January 1, 2021, coinciding with the implementation of the Civil Code.
3. A total of 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents were abolished.
4. The abolished documents span various areas of civil law, including:
   • General civil law principles and statute of limitations
   • Property rights and security interests
   • Contract law and specific contract types
   • Marriage, family, and inheritance law
   • Tort liability and civil compensation
   • Labor dispute resolution
   • Intellectual property protection
   • Civil procedure and enforcement
5. Many of these documents were issued between the 1980s and 2010s, with some dating back to 1982.
6. The abolition was part of the legal cleanup process to eliminate contradictions and inconsistencies with the newly implemented Civil Code.

Webpage Links Relevant to the Question

No content related to this item (no links in the webpage).

Images Helpful for Answering the Question

No content related to this item (no images in the webpage).

1. 网页内容摘要

该网页展示了最高人民法院于2020年12月23日通过的《关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定》，该决定自2021年1月1日起施行。网页主体内容是一份详细的废止文件清单，列出了116项被废止的司法解释及规范性文件，包括各类法律解释、批复、通知、规定等。这些文件涉及民事、经济、婚姻家庭、劳动争议、知识产权等多个法律领域，时间跨度从1980年代到2018年。每项废止文件均列明了序号、标题、发文日期及文号。这些被废止的文件包括最高人民法院关于民法总则、物权法、担保法、合同法、婚姻法、继承法、劳动争议等方面的司法解释，以及关于诉讼程序、管辖权、执行等程序性问题的规定。此次废止文件的决定是最高人民法院对司法解释体系进行清理和优化的重要举措。

2. 与问题相关的信息提取

该网页内容是最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定，详细列出了116项被废止的司法解释和规范性文件。这些废止的文件涵盖了多个法律领域，包括:

1. 民法通则、民法总则相关解释:

   • 第6项：最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国民法总则》诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释(法释〔2018〕12号)
   • 第7项：最高人民法院关于贯彻执行《中华人民共和国民法通则》若干问题的意见(试行)(法(办)发〔1988〕6号)
   • 第79项：最高人民法院对在审判工作中有关适用民法通则时效的几个问题的批复(法(研)复〔1987〕18号)

2. 物权法相关解释:

   • 第8项：最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国物权法》若干问题的解释(一)(法释〔2016〕5号)

3. 担保法相关解释:

   • 第9项：最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国担保法》若干问题的解释(法释〔2000〕44号)
   • 第10-14项：关于抵押、质押等担保问题的多项规定和批复

4. 合同法相关解释:

   • 第16项：最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国合同法》若干问题的解释(一)(法释〔1999〕19号)
   • 第17项：最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国合同法》若干问题的解释(二)(法释〔2009〕5号)
   • 第18-33项：关于合同纠纷的多项批复和规定

5. 婚姻法相关解释:

   • 第36-44项：关于婚姻法的四个解释及多项意见，包括离婚案件、夫妻财产分割、子女抚养等问题

6. 继承法相关解释:

   • 第47-51项：关于继承法的多项解释和批复

7. 劳动争议相关解释:

   • 第62-65项：关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释(一)至(四)

8. 知识产权相关解释:

   • 第82-85项：关于专利侵权、商标权保护的多项规定

9. 民事诉讼程序相关规定:

   • 第86-113项：关于民事诉讼管辖、程序、执行等多项规定

这次废止的司法解释和规范性文件时间跨度较大，从1980年代到2018年不等，表明最高人民法院正在对司法解释体系进行全面清理和更新，可能是为了适应新的法律体系变化，特别是《民法典》的实施。

3. 网页链接分析

网页中没有包含任何超链接。

4. 相关图片提取

网页中没有包含任何图片。

5. 多语言支持

根据您的输入语言为中文，我已用中文提供了回答。

1. Summary of Webpage Content

The webpage contains an official announcement from the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China. The document, titled "Decision on Repealing Certain Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents," was adopted at the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 23, 2020, and published on December 29, 2020. The decision took effect on January 1, 2021.

The purpose of this decision is to implement the Civil Code of China effectively and ensure the uniform and correct application of national laws. According to the document, the Supreme People's Court has decided to repeal 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents, including "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Statute of Limitations System in the General Provisions of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China."

The webpage includes the official announcement, the decision itself (document number: Judicial Interpretation No. 16 [2020]), and mentions that a catalog of the repealed judicial interpretations and normative documents is attached. The image at the bottom of the page appears to contain this catalog, but the image content is not fully readable in the provided text.

2. Information Related to the Question

The webpage contains an official announcement from the Supreme People's Court of China regarding the repeal of certain judicial interpretations and normative documents. The decision was adopted on December 23, 2020, and took effect on January 1, 2021.

The decision specifically repeals 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents, including "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Statute of Limitations System in the General Provisions of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China."

The stated purpose of this decision is to effectively implement the Civil Code of China and ensure the uniform and correct application of national laws. This suggests that the repealed documents may have been inconsistent with or made redundant by the new Civil Code.

The document is officially numbered as "Judicial Interpretation No. 16 [2020]" (法释〔2020〕16号). The announcement mentions that a catalog of all 116 repealed documents is attached, though the full catalog is not readable in the provided text as it appears to be contained in an image.

This decision represents a significant legal cleanup effort coinciding with the implementation of China's Civil Code, which is a major legislative achievement in China's legal system development.

3. Relevant Webpage Links

No content related to the question. The webpage does not contain any hyperlinks.

4. Relevant Images

1. Title: Catalog of Repealed Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents
   Content: A list of the 116 judicial interpretations and normative documents that have been repealed by the Supreme People's Court
   Source: Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China
   Link: [image.png]

网页内容摘要

本网页内容是最高人民法院发布的一则公告，宣布《最高人民法院关于人民法院执行设定抵押的房屋的规定》已于2005年11月14日由最高人民法院审判委员会第1371次会议通过，并将于2005年12月21日起施行。公告日期为2005年12月14日，文号为法释[2005]14号。该规定是根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》等法律制定的，结合了人民法院民事执行工作的实践经验，专门针对人民法院根据抵押权人的申请执行设定抵押房屋的问题进行规范。然而，网页中并未显示该规定的具体内容，只有公告部分。

与"最高人民法院关于人民法院执行设定抵押的房屋的规定"相关的信息

网页内容显示这是一则最高人民法院发布的公告，主要内容如下：

1. 文件名称：《最高人民法院关于人民法院执行设定抵押的房屋的规定》
2. 通过时间：2005年11月14日
3. 通过机构：最高人民法院审判委员会第1371次会议
4. 公布日期：2005年12月14日
5. 施行日期：2005年12月21日
6. 文号：法释[2005]14号
7. 制定依据：《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》等法律
8. 制定背景：结合人民法院民事执行工作的实践
9. 规定内容：针对人民法院根据抵押权人的申请，执行设定抵押的房屋的问题

该规定是关于房屋抵押执行的司法解释，对于规范人民法院执行涉及抵押房屋的案件具有重要意义，但网页中并未提供该规定的具体条款内容。

网页链接

网页中没有显示任何相关链接。

网页图片

网页中没有显示任何相关图片。

Summary of Webpage Content

The webpage contains the Supreme People's Court's regulation on the execution of mortgaged houses, issued on December 14, 2005 (effective December 21, 2005). The regulation addresses how courts should handle the execution of mortgaged properties, particularly balancing creditors' rights with debtors' housing needs.

Key provisions include:

• Courts may seize and auction mortgaged houses owned by the executed person
• When the house is the primary residence, courts must provide a 6-month grace period before forced eviction
• If the executed person cannot solve their housing problem, the applicant for execution must provide temporary housing
• Temporary housing quality and location may differ from the original residence, with area standards based on low-income housing regulations
• Rent for temporary housing is determined by mutual agreement or court decision based on local standards
• Low-income welfare recipients who cannot solve their housing problems cannot be forcibly evicted

The webpage also includes an interview with Yu Lingyu, Director of the Supreme Court's Execution Office, explaining the background and significance of these regulations. The interview clarifies that this regulation addresses the special case of mortgaged houses while maintaining the general principle that necessary living residences should be protected. It represents a compromise between protecting creditors' rights and debtors' right to survival.

Information Related to Execution of Mortgaged Houses

The webpage contains a comprehensive regulation from the Supreme People's Court regarding the execution of mortgaged houses, along with an explanatory interview. Key information includes:

1. Legal basis: The regulation is based on the Civil Procedure Law and practical experience in civil execution work.

2. Execution process for mortgaged houses:

   • Courts can seize mortgaged houses owned by the executed person
   • Courts can auction, sell, or use the property to offset debt based on the mortgagee's application
   • For houses where the executed person and dependents live, a 6-month grace period must be provided after the court orders auction/sale
   • During this period, forced eviction is prohibited
   • After the grace period, if the executed person hasn't vacated, the court can issue a forced eviction order

3. Temporary housing provisions:

   • If the executed person cannot solve their housing problem, the execution applicant must provide temporary housing
   • The temporary housing may differ in quality and location from the original residence
   • The area standard follows the "Administrative Measures for Low-Rent Housing for Urban Low-Income Families"
   • Rent is determined by mutual agreement or court decision based on local standards
   • Rent can be deducted from auction proceeds with priority

4. Special protection for low-income individuals:

   • Executed persons who are low-income welfare recipients and cannot solve their housing problems cannot be forcibly evicted

5. Balancing interests:

   • The regulation aims to balance creditors' rights with debtors' survival rights
   • It distinguishes between mortgaged and non-mortgaged houses in execution
   • For non-mortgaged houses necessary for living, execution is strictly prohibited
   • For mortgaged houses, execution is allowed but with strict conditions and procedures

6. Relationship with previous regulations:

   • This regulation does not modify Article 6 of the "Provisions on Sealing up, Distraining and Freezing Properties in Civil Enforcement by the People's Courts"
   • The two regulations have a general-special relationship, with both remaining in effect

Relevant Webpage Links

1. 中华人民共和国民事诉讼法 - Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China
2. 城镇最低收入家庭廉租住房管理办法 - Administrative Measures for Low-Rent Housing for Urban Low-Income Families
3. 关于人民法院民事执行中查封、扣押、冻结财产的规定 - Provisions on Sealing up, Distraining and Freezing Properties in Civil Enforcement by the People's Courts

Relevant Images

No images are present in the webpage content.

Summary of Webpage Content

The webpage presents the Supreme People's Court of China's regulation titled "Provisions on the Execution of Mortgaged Houses by People's Courts" (法释[2005]14号), which was adopted on November 14, 2005, and implemented on December 21, 2005.
The regulation addresses how courts should handle the execution of mortgaged houses, balancing creditors' rights with debtors' basic living needs. Key provisions include:

1. Courts can seize, auction, sell, or use mortgaged houses to repay debts upon application by the mortgagee.

2. When executing against a mortgaged house where the debtor and dependents reside, courts must provide a six-month grace period before forced eviction.

3. If the debtor cannot solve their housing problem after eviction, the execution applicant must provide temporary housing with area standards based on the "Administrative Measures for Low-Rent Housing for Urban Low-Income Families."

4. Temporary housing can differ in quality and location from the original residence, with rent determined by mutual agreement or court decision based on local standards.

5. Debtors who qualify for minimum living allowance and cannot solve their housing problems cannot be forcibly evicted.

The webpage also includes an interview with Yu Lingyu, Director of the Execution Office of the Supreme People's Court, explaining the background, purpose, and principles of the regulation, emphasizing the balance between creditor rights and debtor survival rights.

Information Related to Mortgage Execution Regulations

The webpage contains comprehensive information about China's regulations on executing mortgaged houses, specifically:

1. Legal Framework: The Supreme People's Court's "Provisions on the Execution of Mortgaged Houses by People's Courts" (法释[2005]14号) from 2005, which provides detailed guidelines for courts when executing against mortgaged properties.

2. Balance of Rights: The regulation aims to balance creditors' rights with debtors' basic living needs, reflecting the principle that "human rights are above creditor rights" while still protecting mortgage creditors.

3. Execution Process: Courts can seize, auction, sell, or use mortgaged houses for debt repayment upon application by mortgagees, but must follow specific procedures when the property is the debtor's primary residence.

4. Protection Measures for Debtors:

   • Six-month grace period before forced eviction
   • Requirement for execution applicants to provide temporary housing if debtors cannot solve their housing problems
   • Standards for temporary housing based on low-rent housing regulations
   • Rent determination procedures for temporary housing
   • Special protection for low-income debtors who qualify for minimum living allowance

5. Relationship with Previous Regulations: The provisions complement rather than replace the 2004 "Provisions on Sealing up, Distraining and Freezing Properties in Civil Executions by People's Courts," which generally prohibits execution against necessary living quarters.

6. Rationale: The interview explains that mortgaged properties are treated differently because:

   • Secured debts deserve stronger protection than unsecured debts
   • Mortgagors are aware of the consequences of default
   • Protection of the mortgage market is necessary for economic development
   • The regulation represents a compromise solution given China's incomplete social security system

7. Implementation Considerations: The provisions acknowledge that while housing security should ideally be a government responsibility, the current social security system is insufficient, necessitating this transitional approach.

Relevant Webpage Links

1. 中华人民共和国民事诉讼法 - Context: Referenced as the legal basis for the provisions on executing mortgaged houses

2. 城镇最低收入家庭廉租住房管理办法 - Context: Referenced as the standard for determining the area of temporary housing provided to debtors

3. 关于人民法院民事执行中查封、扣押、冻结财产的规定 - Context: Referenced as a previous regulation that continues to apply alongside the new provisions

4. 查封规定 - Context: Shorthand reference to the same regulation mentioned above, discussed in the interview section

Images Helpful for Answering the Question

No images are present in the webpage content provided.

人民法院执行设定抵押的房屋的规定

{{query}}

1. Summary of the webpage content (about 300 words):

The webpage presents "The Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Some Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents" which was adopted at the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 23, 2020, and came into effect on January 1, 2021.

The document announces the abolition of 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents to effectively implement the Civil Code and ensure the unified and correct application of national laws. The decision was made in accordance with the Civil Code and other legal provisions, combined with judicial practice.

The main content of the webpage is a comprehensive catalog listing all 116 abolished documents, organized by sequence number, title, and issuance date/document number. These documents cover various legal areas including:

• Civil procedure and litigation
• Contract law
• Property rights
• Marriage and family law
• Inheritance law
• Labor dispute resolution
• Financial and banking regulations
• Corporate bankruptcy
• Intellectual property protection
• Arbitration procedures
• Judicial enforcement

Many of these documents were issued between the 1980s and 2010s, with the earliest dating back to 1982 and the most recent from 2018. Notable abolished interpretations include those related to the General Principles of Civil Law, Property Law, Contract Law, Marriage Law, and Labor Dispute cases.

The document was published by the Supreme People's Court on December 29, 2020, and is identified by document number "法释〔2020〕16号". The webpage indicates it was sourced from the Chongqing High People's Court.

2. Information related to the question "The Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Some Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents":

The document presented is the official "Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Some Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents" (法释〔2020〕16号). It was adopted at the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 23, 2020, and officially published on December 29, 2020. The decision came into effect on January 1, 2021.

The purpose of this decision is to effectively implement the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China and ensure the unified and correct application of national laws. The decision abolishes 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents that were previously in effect.

The document provides a comprehensive catalog of all abolished items, listing them by sequence number, title, and issuance date/document number. These documents span several decades, with the earliest dating back to 1982 and the most recent from 2018.

The abolished documents cover a wide range of legal areas including civil procedure, contract law, property rights, marriage and family law, inheritance law, labor disputes, financial regulations, bankruptcy, intellectual property protection, and arbitration procedures.

Notable abolished interpretations include:

• Interpretation on the Statute of Limitations System in the General Principles of Civil Law (2018)
• Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Property Law (2016)
• Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Contract Law (1999, 2009)
• Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Marriage Law (2001, 2003, 2011, 2017)
• Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases (2001, 2006, 2010, 2013)

The decision was made in accordance with the Civil Code and other legal provisions, combined with practical judicial experience.

3. Top 10 webpage links most relevant to the question:

4. 践行依法行政 巫山县公安局局长出庭应诉 - Context: Related legal administrative practice article from the same source

5. 市二中法院辖区各区县人大常委会主任片区座谈会召开 - Context: Related judicial system news from the same source

6. No images are present in the webpage that are helpful for answering the question.

7. 多语言支持：根据您的输入，我已用英文回答了您的问题。如果您希望使用其他支持的语言（中文、日语、韩语、繁体中文、西班牙语或葡萄牙语），请告知我。

Summary of Webpage Content

The webpage presents the Supreme People's Court of China's decision to abolish 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents. The decision was passed on December 23, 2020, during the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court and took effect on January 1, 2021. This action was taken to effectively implement the Civil Code of China and ensure the unified and correct application of national laws. The document includes a comprehensive list of all 116 abolished items, organized by number, title, and original publication date/reference number. These abolished documents cover various legal areas including civil procedure, contract law, marriage law, inheritance law, labor disputes, property rights, and many other aspects of Chinese civil law.

Information Related to the Question

The webpage contains the Supreme People's Court of China's decision (法释〔2020〕16号) to abolish 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents. This decision was made to implement the Civil Code of China effectively and ensure the unified and correct application of national laws.

Key details:

1. The decision was passed on December 23, 2020, during the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court.
2. The decision took effect on January 1, 2021.
3. The document includes a comprehensive catalog of all 116 abolished items, listing their titles, issuance dates, and document numbers.
4. The abolished documents cover various legal areas including:
   • Civil procedure rules
   • Contract law interpretations
   • Marriage and family law guidelines
   • Property rights regulations
   • Inheritance law interpretations
   • Labor dispute resolution procedures
   • Financial and banking regulations
   • Corporate bankruptcy provisions
   • Intellectual property protections
   • Judicial administrative regulations

Many of these abolished documents were replaced by provisions in the new Civil Code, which represented a significant consolidation and modernization of China's civil law system.

Relevant Webpage Links

1. 践行依法行政 巫山县公安局局长出庭应诉
2. 市二中法院辖区各区县人大常委会主任片区座谈会召开
3. "瘾情侣"多次容留他人吸毒被判刑 (No direct link provided)

Relevant Images

No images are present in the webpage content that relate to the question.

1. 网页内容摘要

该网页展示了《最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定》，该决定于2020年12月23日由最高人民法院审判委员会第1823次会议通过，并于2021年1月1日起施行。文件列出了116项被废止的司法解释及相关规范性文件，包括其序号、标题、发文日期及文号。

被废止的文件涵盖了多个法律领域，包括民法总则、物权法、担保法、合同法、婚姻法、继承法、劳动争议、知识产权、民事诉讼等方面的司法解释。这些文件发布时间跨度从1982年到2018年不等，其中包括最高人民法院发布的各类规定、解释、批复、通知、意见等形式的规范性文件。这次废止是为了清理与新法律法规不相适应的司法解释，保持司法解释体系的统一性和时效性。

2. 与废止司法解释相关的信息

该网页完整展示了最高人民法院废止的116项司法解释及相关规范性文件的清单。这次废止是在2020年12月23日由最高人民法院审判委员会第1823次会议通过的，并于2021年1月1日起施行。

废止的司法解释涵盖了广泛的法律领域：

1. 民法领域：包括《关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》、《关于贯彻执行〈中华人民共和国民法通则〉若干问题的意见（试行）》等
2. 物权法领域：如《关于适用〈中华人民共和国物权法〉若干问题的解释（一）》
3. 担保法领域：如《关于适用〈中华人民共和国担保法〉若干问题的解释》
4. 合同法领域：如《关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释（一）》和《解释（二）》
5. 婚姻法领域：包括《关于适用〈中华人民共和国婚姻法〉若干问题的解释（一）》至《解释（三）》及补充规定
6. 继承法领域：如《关于贯彻执行〈中华人民共和国继承法〉若干问题的意见》
7. 劳动争议领域：如《关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释》系列
8. 知识产权领域：如专利侵权、商标保护相关解释
9. 民事诉讼领域：如督促程序、诉讼管辖等相关规定

这些被废止的文件时间跨度大，最早的是1982年发布的《关于人民法院公开审判非涉外案件是否准许外国人旁听或采访问题的批复》，最新的是2018年发布的《关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释（二）》。废止这些文件可能是因为它们已被新的法律法规或司法解释所替代，或者其内容已不适应当前法律体系和社会发展需要。

3. 相关网页链接

网页中未包含任何超链接。

4. 相关图片

网页中未包含任何图片。

5. 多语言支持

本回答使用中文提供，与用户输入的语言相匹配。

1. 网页内容摘要

该网页展示了《最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定》，该决定于2020年12月23日由最高人民法院审判委员会第1823次会议通过，并于2021年1月1日起施行。网页主体内容是一份详细清单，列出了被废止的116项司法解释及相关规范性文件，包括其序号、标题、发文日期及文号。这些被废止的文件涵盖了民事、经济、婚姻家庭、劳动争议、知识产权等多个法律领域，时间跨度从1982年至2018年。每项条目清晰列明了文件的具体名称和发布信息，便于查询和参考。这份废止清单反映了最高人民法院对司法解释体系进行的系统性清理和更新工作。

2. 与废止司法解释相关的信息提取

该网页完整展示了最高人民法院废止的116项司法解释及相关规范性文件的详细清单。这些被废止的文件具有以下特点：

1. 时间跨度：从1982年至2018年，覆盖了近40年的司法解释历史。

2. 法律领域覆盖广泛：

   • 民事基本法律：包括《民法通则》《民法总则》《物权法》《合同法》《担保法》等相关解释
   • 婚姻家庭法：包括离婚案件、夫妻财产分割、子女抚养等相关解释
   • 继承法：关于遗产处理的多项解释
   • 劳动争议：多部劳动争议案件适用法律的解释
   • 知识产权：专利侵权、商标专用权等相关解释
   • 民事诉讼程序：关于管辖、送达、保全、执行等程序性问题的解释

3. 废止原因分析：虽然网页未明确说明废止原因，但从被废止文件的性质可推断可能是因为：

   • 与新法律法规不相适应（如《民法典》的实施）
   • 内容已被新的司法解释所替代
   • 解决的问题已不具有现实意义
   • 法律体系的系统性整合需要

4. 废止决定的法律效力：该决定由最高人民法院审判委员会通过，自2021年1月1日起施行，这一时间点与《民法典》实施时间一致，表明这次废止工作可能与《民法典》的实施密切相关。

5. 重要领域的废止情况：

   • 婚姻家庭领域：废止了《婚姻法》的四个司法解释及多个相关规定
   • 合同法领域：废止了《合同法》司法解释(一)和(二)
   • 物权和担保领域：废止了《物权法》和《担保法》的司法解释
   • 劳动争议领域：废止了四个关于劳动争议案件适用法律的解释

这次大规模废止司法解释的行动，反映了最高人民法院对司法解释体系进行的系统性清理和更新，为新的法律体系实施创造条件。

3. 相关网页链接

网页中未包含任何超链接。

4. 相关图片

网页中未包含任何图片。

5. 多语言支持

本回答使用中文提供，与用户输入的语言相匹配。

Summary of the Webpage Content

This webpage contains the "Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Certain Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents," which was adopted at the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 23, 2020, and implemented from January 1, 2021. The decision was made to effectively implement the Civil Code of China and ensure the unified and correct application of national laws.

The document announces the abolition of 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents, including "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Statute of Limitations System in the Application of the General Provisions of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China" and others.

The main content is a comprehensive catalog listing all 116 abolished documents, organized by sequence number, title, and issuance date/document number. These documents cover various legal areas including civil law, contract law, property rights, marriage law, inheritance law, labor disputes, intellectual property, and procedural matters. The abolished documents span from 1982 to 2018, representing a significant update to China's judicial interpretation system in preparation for the implementation of the new Civil Code.

Information Related to the Question

The document is the "Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Certain Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents" (法释〔2020〕16号), issued on December 29, 2020, and implemented from January 1, 2021.

The decision was adopted at the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 23, 2020.

The purpose of this decision is to effectively implement the Civil Code of China and ensure the unified and correct application of national laws.

The document abolishes 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents that were previously issued by the Supreme People's Court. These abolished documents span from 1982 to 2018 and cover various legal areas including:

• Civil law general provisions
• Property rights
• Contract law
• Marriage and family law
• Inheritance law
• Tort liability
• Financial regulations
• Labor disputes
• Intellectual property
• Civil procedure

Notable abolished documents include:

• Interpretations on the General Provisions of Civil Law
• Interpretations on Property Law
• Interpretations on Contract Law
• Interpretations on Marriage Law
• Interpretations on Labor Dispute Cases
• Various judicial interpretations on financial matters, bankruptcy, and commercial disputes

This decision represents a significant update to China's judicial interpretation system in preparation for the implementation of the new Civil Code, which came into effect on January 1, 2021, the same day this decision became effective.

No Webpage Links to Extract

The provided webpage does not contain any hyperlinks.

No Images to Extract

The provided webpage does not contain any images.

人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定

最高人民法院关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定

摘要

本文件是最高人民法院于2020年12月23日通过并于2020年12月29日公布的关于废止部分司法解释及相关规范性文件的决定(法释〔2020〕16号)。该决定废止了116件司法解释及相关规范性文件，自2021年1月1日起施行。废止这些文件的目的是为了切实实施民法典，保证国家法律统一正确适用。被废止的文件涵盖了民法总则、物权法、担保法、合同法、婚姻法、继承法、劳动争议、知识产权、民事诉讼等多个法律领域的司法解释和规范性文件，时间跨度从1982年至2018年。这些文件的废止标志着中国法律体系特别是民事法律体系的重大调整，为民法典的全面实施扫清了法律障碍。

与废止司法解释相关的信息

本决定是为了配合《中华人民共和国民法典》的实施而做出的。被废止的116件司法解释及相关规范性文件包括：

1. 关于民法总则的解释，如《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》
2. 关于物权法的解释，如《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国物权法〉若干问题的解释（一）》
3. 关于担保法的解释，如《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国担保法〉若干问题的解释》
4. 关于合同法的解释，如《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释（一）》和《解释（二）》
5. 关于婚姻法的解释，如《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国婚姻法〉若干问题的解释（一）》、《解释（二）》、《解释（三）》及补充规定
6. 关于继承法的意见，如《最高人民法院关于贯彻执行〈中华人民共和国继承法〉若干问题的意见》
7. 关于劳动争议的解释，如《最高人民法院关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释》系列
8. 关于民事诉讼的规定，如《最高人民法院关于适用督促程序若干问题的规定》

这些文件的废止表明最高人民法院正在对司法解释体系进行全面清理，以适应民法典时代的司法需求，确保法律适用的统一性和一致性。

相关网页链接

无相关链接。

相关图片

无相关图片。

Summary of the Webpage Content

The webpage contains a decision by the Supreme People's Court of China regarding the abolition of certain judicial interpretations and related normative documents. The decision was passed on December 23, 2020, during the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court and came into effect on January 1, 2021. The document explains that this decision is made to effectively implement the Civil Code of China and ensure the uniform and correct application of national laws.

The main content of the webpage is a comprehensive list of 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents that are being abolished. These documents span various legal areas including civil law, contract law, property rights, marriage law, inheritance law, labor disputes, intellectual property, and procedural matters. The list is presented in a table format with columns for serial number, document title, and issuance date/document number.

The abolished documents include interpretations related to the General Principles of Civil Law, Property Law, Guarantee Law, Contract Law, Marriage Law, Inheritance Law, and various procedural regulations. Many of these documents were issued between the 1980s and 2010s, with some dating back to 1982 and others as recent as 2018.

This abolition appears to be part of a legal cleanup process to harmonize the judicial interpretation system with the newly implemented Civil Code of China.

Information Related to the Question

The webpage is a decision document issued by the Supreme People's Court of China on December 29, 2020, announcing the abolition of 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents. The decision was made during the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 23, 2020, and took effect on January 1, 2021.

The document states that the purpose of this abolition is to effectively implement the Civil Code of China and ensure the uniform and correct application of national laws. This indicates that the abolished documents were likely inconsistent with or made redundant by the new Civil Code.

The list of abolished documents covers a wide range of legal areas, including:

• Civil law general principles and statute of limitations
• Property rights and guarantee law
• Contract law and various types of contracts (construction, partnership, etc.)
• Marriage and family law
• Inheritance law
• Corporate bankruptcy and liquidation
• Financial regulations and banking
• Labor disputes
• Intellectual property (patents and trademarks)
• Civil procedure and jurisdiction
• Judicial enforcement and arbitration

Many of these documents were quite old, with some dating back to the 1980s, while others were relatively recent (up to 2018). This suggests a comprehensive legal cleanup to modernize the judicial interpretation system in line with the Civil Code.

The abolition took effect simultaneously with the implementation of the Civil Code of China on January 1, 2021, highlighting the connection between these two legal developments.

Relevant Webpage Links

No links are present in the provided webpage content.

Relevant Images

No images are present in the provided webpage content.

Summary

The webpage appears to be an access verification page that requires user interaction before allowing access to the main content. The page contains minimal content, primarily consisting of a verification prompt and a slider mechanism. Users are instructed to "slide to complete the verification process before accessing the web page" for a "better experience." The verification mechanism appears to be a security measure, possibly to prevent automated access or to verify that the user is human. The page does not contain any substantive content related to any specific topic, as it serves purely as a gateway or security checkpoint before users can access the actual content of the website.

Information Related to the Question

No content related to the question. The webpage is simply an access verification page with a slider mechanism that users must interact with before they can access the actual content of the website. There is no substantive information on this page that would be relevant to any specific query.

Relevant Links

No links are present on the webpage that could be identified as relevant to the question.

Relevant Images

No images related to the question are present on the webpage. The page only contains a verification slider mechanism.

Summary of the Webpage Content

This webpage presents the "Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Some Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents" (with catalog), issued on December 29, 2020. The decision was passed at the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 23, 2020, and took effect on January 1, 2021.

The document explains that to effectively implement the Civil Code and ensure the unified and correct application of national laws, the Supreme People's Court has decided to abolish 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents. The main purpose is to align the judicial system with the provisions of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

The bulk of the webpage consists of a detailed catalog listing all 116 abolished documents, organized by number, title, and date of issuance. These documents cover various legal areas including:

• Civil procedure and litigation
• Contract law
• Property rights
• Marriage and family law
• Inheritance law
• Labor dispute resolution
• Financial and banking regulations
• Corporate bankruptcy
• Intellectual property protection
• Arbitration procedures

Many of these documents were judicial interpretations of previous laws that have been superseded by the Civil Code, including interpretations of the General Principles of Civil Law, Contract Law, Marriage Law, and Property Law.

Information Related to the Question

The webpage contains the "Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Abolishing Some Judicial Interpretations and Related Normative Documents" issued on December 29, 2020. This decision abolishes 116 judicial interpretations and related normative documents to align with the implementation of China's Civil Code.

Key information from the document:

1. The decision was passed at the 1823rd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 23, 2020.
2. The decision took effect on January 1, 2021, coinciding with the implementation of the Civil Code.
3. The purpose of abolishing these documents is to ensure the unified and correct application of national laws, particularly the Civil Code.
4. The abolished documents include judicial interpretations on various aspects of civil law, including:
   • Interpretations of the General Principles of Civil Law
   • Property Law interpretations
   • Contract Law interpretations
   • Marriage Law interpretations
   • Inheritance Law interpretations
   • Labor dispute resolution interpretations
   • Financial and banking regulations
   • Intellectual property protection documents
   • Civil procedure interpretations

Notable abolished documents include:

• Interpretation on the Statute of Limitations System under the General Principles of Civil Law (No. 6)
• Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Property Law (No. 8)
• Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Guarantee Law (No. 9)
• Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Contract Law (Nos. 16-17)
• Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Marriage Law (Nos. 40-44)

This document represents a significant legal cleanup to accommodate the implementation of the Civil Code, which consolidated and replaced several previous standalone laws.

Webpage Links Relevant to the Question

No links are present in the webpage content.

Images Helpful for Answering the Question

No images are present in the webpage content.