预备调查清单
待核查内容1:该研究发表于《nature communications》杂志
待核查内容2:由悉尼大学查尔斯·珀金斯中心的Alistair Senior博士、博士候选人Caitlin Andrews及其团队开展
待核查内容3:他们研究了1961年至2018年期间101个国家的食品供应和人口统计数据
待核查内容4:并对数据进行了调整,以考虑人口规模和财富差异
待核查内容5:摄入更多植物蛋白(如鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆)的国家,成年人的预期寿命更长
待核查内容6:第一作者Caitlin Andrews表示:“在比较肉类与植物蛋白对人群健康影响方面,我们的研究呈现出复杂的局面。对于五岁以下儿童而言,供应大量动物蛋白和脂肪(如肉类、蛋类和乳制品)的食品系统降低了婴儿死亡率。然而,对于成年人来说,情况则相反,植物蛋白的摄入增加了整体预期寿命。”
行动计划
Search
悉尼大学 Alistair Senior Caitlin Andrews 植物蛋白 寿命 Nature Communications我需要更多关于这项研究的具体信息。让我尝试搜索更精确的关键词来找到原始研究论文。
Search
Associations between national plant-based vs animal-based protein availability and population health outcomes Nature Communications我现在找到了一些相关信息,但需要访问原始研究论文来进行更深入的核查。让我尝试访问Nature Communications上发表的这篇研究论文。
本研究探讨了动物蛋白(ABP)与植物蛋白(PBP)供应对年龄特异性死亡率(ASM)的影响。研究使用了来自101个国家1961-2018年的数据,结合联合国粮农组织(FAO)的食物平衡表、人类死亡率数据库的生命表数据、麦迪逊项目数据库的经济统计数据以及联合国人口司的年龄性别特定人口估计。研究采用营养几何框架(GFN)分析了宏量营养素供应与人类生存率的关系。
研究发现,全球蛋白质供应趋势显示ABP与PBP比例在不同国家间逐渐趋同,总蛋白质供应量随时间增加,主要归因于ABP增加。经济财富与蛋白质供应呈正相关,GDP较低地区PBP比例更高。研究还发现,脂肪供应较低、碳水化合物供应较高的地区,PBP相对于ABP的比例更大。
在年龄特异性死亡率方面,研究分析了5岁(l5)和60岁(l60)的生存率作为早期和晚期生存的标志,并按性别进行了分层分析。研究使用广义加性混合模型(GAMM)进行统计建模,探索了宏量营养素供应、时间、国家和财富之间的相互作用。
网页内容未明确列出研究作者的姓名。
我需要获取更多关于这篇研究的作者信息和详细发现。让我继续查看这篇论文的更多内容。
In an era marked by the pressing need for decarbonization and environmental sustainability, global food systems, which contribute a third of all greenhouse gas emissions, are under increasing scrutiny1. Food systems are complex social-ecological networks that encompass all processes and infrastructure involved in feeding a population2. Many have argued that a reduction in the production of animal-based foods is key to achieving more sustainable food systems3, however, reduced production of animal-based foods is likely to result in a substitution of animal-based protein (ABP) for plant-based protein (PBP) and/or a reduction in total protein supplies within food systems4. For many populations, this transition therefore represents a substantial change in the nutritional environment. The capacity of post-transition PBP-rich nutritional environments to support the health of different demographics and age-classes has become a focus of debate5.
In general, the nutritional environment, encompassing factors such as the quality, quantity, and source of nutrients available for consumption, has been identified as a critical determinant of health and survivorship at different ages6. Malnutrition, including ‘undernutrition’, ‘overnutrition’ and imbalanced nutrition, are major risk factors for numerous age-related chronic diseases7, which remain the leading cause of death and age-related disability globally8. Furthermore, the health of older adults may be especially sensitive to the nutritional environment, as this demographic displays elevated risk of both under- and over-nutrition in a food-insecure environment9. At the other end of life, stunting or chronic malnutrition primarily occurs during the first 1000 days from conception due to insufficient maternal or child nutrition10. This often results from a food system that provides limited access to adequate and high-quality foods and is linked to an increased risk of death.
The availability of macronutrients, and particularly protein, at the national level is of interest when considering how nutritional environments affect health and survivorship as a function of age. There is abundant evidence that at the dietary level (i.e. below that of the nutritional environment) protein intake affects health. At the level of diet composition, recent reviews11,12 suggest that protein content, and, particularly, its amounts relative to the quantity of carbohydrate, plays a vital role in shaping age-related health outcomes. At the level of individual intakes, protein appears to exhibit a non-linear relationship with all-cause mortality, relative to total caloric intake in the diet, with both low and high protein intakes associated with increased mortality risk13,14. Furthermore, researchers have advocated for increases in protein intake recommendations for adults of all ages, but especially among older individuals15,16.
At the dietary level, the associations between protein and mortality also appear to vary depending on the source, with ABP potentially having a greater impact on mortality than PBP sources17,18. In particular, high intake of processed meats and—with less certainty—unprocessed red meats, has been linked to an increased risk of certain chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and some types of cancer19,20. On the other hand, plant protein sources, such as legumes, nuts, and whole grains, have been associated with a lower risk of chronic diseases and overall mortality18,21. Researchers have proposed that a predominantly plant-based diet is one of the key common denominators contributing to the extended vitality and longevity observed in long-lived communities, also known as “blue zones“22,23. These “blue zones,” including Okinawa, Japan; Ikaria, Greece; and Loma Linda, California; among others, have been found to have diets high in predominantly plant-based foods and low in animal-based protein. The differential associations of protein sources have been attributed to various dietary factors, such as nutrient composition and bioactive compounds24. While the exact causes remain the focus of ongoing work, there is sufficient evidence to suspect that transitioning from ABP to PBP sources can, at the very least, lead to a shift in the overall nutrient profile of the diet. The nutritional variation reflected in this shift may contribute to differences in health outcomes among humans.
A tool that can be used to parse the differential effects of nutrients and their interactions on outcomes of interest is the geometric framework for nutrition (GFN)25. The GFN is a comprehensive multi-dimensional framework that allows simultaneous examination of undernutrition, overnutrition, nutrient amounts, and compositions within a single framework. It enables insights into the combined macronutrient landscape associated with food environments, and identifies interactive relationships between nutritional components and response variables. The aim of the current study is to assess how the nutritional environment, with special reference to national per capita supplies of ABP and PBP, associates with patterns of age-specific mortality (ASM). Within this context, ASM emerges as an indicator of population-wide, and age-specific, health26. ASM serves as a standardised measure to assess the broader impact of nutritional environments on the morbidity of different age groups.
In this study, we used the GFN to investigate the associations between PBP versus ABP supplies on ASM using global demographic data. Our dataset comprises complete country- and year-specific entries from 101 different countries, spanning 1961–2018. We used data on macronutrient supply quantities available for human consumption from food balance sheets (FBS; see Methods for full explanation) compiled by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Specifically, these data reflect the average availability of food and nutrients at the national level, which are crucial for understanding the nutritional environment’s ability to support population health. This FBS supply data was combined with sex-specific mortality data (specifically, the proportion of individuals within a cohort that survive to each age) from life tables provided at the Human Mortality Database, economic statistics from the Maddison Project Database, and age, sex specific population estimates from the population division of the United Nations. We explored interactions between macronutrient supplies, time, country, and wealth, with statistical corrections to control for possible confounding by such factors. Using the best approximating model, we predicted the effects of ABP, PBP, fat and carbohydrate supplies on human life table parameters. Additionally, we considered age-specific macronutrient and energy availabilities for optimising survival over the human life course.
The collated data comprised complete entries for macronutrient supplies from national food balance sheets (FBSs), survivorship at ages 5 and 60 ($ {l}_{5}\ and \ {l}_{60}\ , i.e., the proportion of a cohort still alive at ages 5 and 60) from national life tables, and gross domestic product per capita (GDP) across both sexes, for 101 countries. Briefly, per capita food supply data provided by FBSs refers to the average amount of food available for consumption per person within a nation for a given year, a foundational element of the nutritional environments contributing to health outcomes across different populations. Quantities of food items available for consumption are calculated based on the total quantities produced and imported, adjusting for any changes in stocks including exports. FBSs also give daily per capita supplies in terms of total energy, and specific energy sources, based on composition factors[27](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58475-1#ref-CR27 "Food And Agriculture Organization The United Nation. Food Balance SHEETS - A Handbook. https://www.fao.org/4/X9892E/X9892e02.htm#P430_31575 (2001)."). Here we have analysed daily per capita protein supplies from animal and vegetal sources (i.e., animal-based protein and plant-based protein; ABP and PBP), as well as daily per capita supplies of total fat supplies and carbohydrate (note that carbohydrate was estimated as total available energy less energy from alcohol, ABP, PBP and fat). Our final dataset spanned from 1961 to 2018 with data from 4000 country-, year-, and sex-specific life tables. We begin by summarising the trends and global coverage of daily per capita protein supplies in our dataset. Figure [1A](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58475-1#Fig1) and B show the ratio of ABP to PBP supplies across different countries in historic (1961–1990) and more recent (1991–2018) data, respectively. The geographic distribution of supplies shows a temporal trend towards convergence, where areas with higher ratios of ABP to PBP supplies in earlier years, such as northern America, north and west Europe, Argentina, Hong Kong, and New Zealand, tend to show a reduction in later years. In contrast, areas where supply is predominantly PBP in early years, including most parts of central and south America, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, show an increase in the ratio of ABP to PBP supplies during more recent years. Figure [1C](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58475-1#Fig1) illustrates an average convergence of total ABP and PBP supply quantities, toward parity around the mid 1990’s and remaining relatively similar thereafter. Notably, the total protein supplies available within countries has tended to increase over time, largely attributable to increased ABP (Fig. [1C](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58475-1#Fig1)). Within the data there is a positive association between total protein supplies and economic wealth, with a greater proportion of PBP to ABP where GDP is lower and the ratio of ABP to PBP increases up to GDP values of ~2011 12,000 per capita (Fig. 1D). Additionally, Fig. 1E and 1F show a greater proportion of PBP supplies relative to ABP where fat supplies are lower and carbohydrate supplies are higher, and vice versa.
Fig. 1: Summary of global protein supplies (kcal/capita/day) and correlations within the available data.
A Average log ratio of animal-based to plant-based protein supplies for each country, from 1961–1990, and B 1991 –2018, using all available data; grey shows an absence of data. (C) Supplies of plant- and animal-based protein as a function of year, D GDP per capita, (E) fat supplies (kcal/capita/day), and (F) carbohydrate supplies (kcal/capita/day). C–F The individual data points show the raw data values. The red, green, and blue smoothed lines represent the predicted values for ABP, PBP, and total protein, respectively, based on year (C), GDP (D), fat supplies (E), and carbohydrate supplies (F). Predictions were obtained using generalized additive mixed models, with random effects for countries. The shaded areas around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals centred on these predictions. The smooth term significance is detailed in Supplementary Table 1 to Supplementary Table 12. GDP gross domestic product per capita (expressed in international-$ at 2011 prices). A, B Map data from Natural Earth, facilitated by rnaturalearth R package94.
Using the model life table approach proposed by the World Health Organisation (WHO)28, a comprehensive picture of ASM in human populations can be built by taking survivorship to ages 5 ($ l\ 5) and 60 (\ l\ 60) as markers of early and late life survival, respectively. Hence, we assessed the \ l\ 5 and \ l\ 60 data using separate analyses. We further stratified the data into male and female survivorship, yielding four subsets for statistical modelling (i.e., \ l\ 5 male; \ l\ 60 male; \ l\ 5 female; \ l\ $60 female). Our primary tool was the generalised additive mixed model (GAMM). To each subset we fitted several models exploring a r ...
已核查结论清单
已核查内容1:该研究发表于《nature communications》杂志
已核查内容2:他们研究了1961年至2018年期间101个国家的食品供应和人口统计数据
已核查内容3:并对数据进行了调整,以考虑人口规模和财富差异
待补充核查清单
待核查内容1:由悉尼大学查尔斯·珀金斯中心的Alistair Senior博士、博士候选人Caitlin Andrews及其团队开展
待核查内容2:第一作者Caitlin Andrews表示:“在比较肉类与植物蛋白对人群健康影响方面,我们的研究呈现出复杂的局面。对于五岁以下儿童而言,供应大量动物蛋白和脂肪(如肉类、蛋类和乳制品)的食品系统降低了婴儿死亡率。然而,对于成年人来说,情况则相反,植物蛋白的摄入增加了整体预期寿命。”
待核查内容3:摄入更多植物蛋白(如鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆)的国家,成年人的预期寿命更长
行动计划
这篇论文探讨了动物蛋白(ABP)与植物蛋白(PBP)供应对不同年龄段人类死亡率的影响。研究采用营养几何框架(GFN)分析了101个国家从1961-2018年的数据,结合了联合国粮农组织(FAO)的食物平衡表、人类死亡率数据库的生命表、麦迪逊项目数据库的经济统计数据以及联合国人口统计数据。研究发现,全球蛋白质供应趋势显示ABP与PBP比例在1990年代中期趋于平衡,总蛋白质供应量随时间增加主要归因于ABP增加。研究还发现GDP与蛋白质供应呈正相关,低GDP国家PBP比例更高。论文使用世界卫生组织的模型生命表方法,以5岁和60岁的存活率作为早期和晚期生存的标志,并通过广义加性混合模型(GAMM)分析了蛋白质供应与年龄特异性死亡率之间的关系,考虑了宏量营养素供应、时间、国家和财富等因素的交互作用。
根据网页内容,这篇论文的作者信息并未在提供的摘要部分明确列出。在学术论文中,作者通常会在标题下方或文章开头处列出,但在提供的内容中没有这部分信息。
关于Caitlin Andrews和Alistair Senior是否是作者,在提供的文本中没有任何提及这两个人的信息。文中没有出现这两个名字,也没有提到任何作者的机构信息。
提供的内容主要是论文的引言部分,介绍了研究背景、目的和方法,但没有包含作者署名、作者单位等信息。通常这些信息会出现在论文的首页或标题页,但在当前提供的网页内容中缺失这部分。
我需要继续查找更多信息来确认作者信息。让我尝试在悉尼大学网站上查找相关新闻稿。
Search
Sydney University Charles Perkins Centre Alistair Senior Caitlin Andrews plant protein lifespan study news release我找到了一些相关信息,但需要进一步查找作者信息和悉尼大学的新闻稿。让我访问悉尼大学网站上关于这项研究的新闻稿。
网页解析
https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/04/16/plant-based-diet-linked-to-longer-life.html这篇研究由悉尼大学的专家进行,发表在《自然通讯》杂志上,探讨了植物性蛋白质与动物性蛋白质消费对人类寿命的影响。研究团队分析了1961-2018年间101个国家的食物供应和人口统计数据,并对人口规模和财富因素进行了校正。研究发现,消费更多植物性蛋白质(如鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆)的国家成年人寿命更长。然而,对5岁以下儿童而言,提供大量动物性蛋白质和脂肪的食物系统降低了婴儿死亡率。研究比较了如澳大利亚、美国等动物性蛋白质消费较高的国家与巴基斯坦、印度尼西亚等植物性食品消费更普遍的地区。研究还指出,高水平的动物性蛋白质(尤其是加工肉类)长期以来与心血管疾病、2型糖尿病和某些癌症等慢性疾病有关,而植物蛋白质则与较低的慢性疾病风险和总体死亡率相关。
这篇研究的作者包括第一作者Caitlin Andrews(博士候选人)和首席研究员Dr. Alistair Senior,他们来自悉尼大学Charles Perkins Centre。研究团队还包括其他未具体提及的成员。
研究的主要发现是:
Caitlin Andrews的引述:
"我们的研究表明,在比较肉类与植物性蛋白质对人口健康影响时,情况是复杂的。对于5岁以下儿童,提供大量动物性蛋白质和脂肪(如肉类、鸡蛋和乳制品)的食物系统降低了婴儿死亡率。然而,对于成年人,情况正好相反,植物性蛋白质增加了总体预期寿命。"
网页内容中没有提供图片链接。
我现在有了更多信息,但还需要确认论文的完整作者列表。让我查看Nature Communications上的原始论文。
本论文探讨了动物蛋白(ABP)与植物蛋白(PBP)供应对不同年龄段人口死亡率的影响。研究使用了几何营养框架(GFN)分析了来自101个国家1961-2018年间的数据,包括联合国粮农组织(FAO)的食物平衡表、人类死亡率数据库的生命表数据、麦迪逊项目数据库的经济统计数据以及联合国人口分部的年龄性别人口估计。研究发现全球蛋白质供应趋势显示,早期ABP与PBP比例差异较大的地区逐渐趋于平衡,总蛋白质供应量随时间增加,主要归因于ABP增加。研究还发现GDP较低的国家PBP比例更高,而GDP增长到约12,000美元/人时ABP比例增加。通过广义加性混合模型(GAMM)分析,研究探讨了宏量营养素供应与年龄特异性死亡率的关系,特别关注5岁和60岁的生存率作为早期和晚期生存的标志。研究结果对理解营养环境如何影响不同年龄人群健康具有重要意义,尤其是在全球食品系统向可持续发展转型的背景下。
根据网页内容,这篇论文的作者信息并未在提供的摘要和引言部分直接列出。通常,学术论文的作者和机构信息会出现在论文的标题页或首页,但在提供的内容中没有包含这部分信息。
从内容中可以看出,这是一篇发表在Nature Communications期刊上的研究论文,论文编号为s41467-025-58475-1,研究主题是关于动物蛋白和植物蛋白供应对不同年龄段人口死亡率的影响。
论文引用了多篇相关研究,从引用格式可以看出这是一篇学术性很强的研究论文,但在提供的内容中没有直接显示作者列表和他们所属的机构信息。
网页内容主要包括论文的引言部分和部分研究结果,但缺少论文的标题页、作者信息页以及完整的方法和讨论部分,因此无法确定该论文的完整作者列表和他们的机构归属。
Crippa, M. et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Food 2, 198–209 (2021). - 上下文:全球食品系统贡献了三分之一的温室气体排放
Béné, C. et al. When food systems meet sustainability – current narratives and implications for actions. World Dev. 113, 116–130 (2019). - 上下文:食品系统是复杂的社会生态网络
Augustin, M. A. & Cole, M. B. Towards a sustainable food system by design using faba bean protein as an example. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 125, 1–11 (2022). - 上下文:减少动物性食品生产是实现更可持续食品系统的关键
Lonnie, M. & Johnstone, A. M. The public health rationale for promoting plant protein as an important part of a sustainable and healthy diet. Nutr. Bull. 45, 281–293 (2020). - 上下文:减少动物性食品生产可能导致动物蛋白被植物蛋白替代
Willett, W. et al. Food in the anthropocene: the EAT-lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019). - 上下文:转型后以植物蛋白为主的营养环境支持不同人群健康的能力成为辩论焦点
Fanzo, J., Bellows, A. L., Spiker, M. L., Thorne-Lyman, A. L. & Bloem, M. W. The importance of food systems and the environment for nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 113, 7–16 (2021). - 上下文:营养不良是多种与年龄相关的慢性疾病的主要风险因素
Viroli, G., Kalmpourtzidou, A. & Cena, H. Exploring benefits and barriers of plant-based diets: health, environmental impact, food accessibility and acceptability. Nutrients 15, 4723 (2023). - 上下文:慢性疾病仍是全球死亡和与年龄相关残疾的主要原因
Pereira, M. H. Q., Pereira, M. L. A. S., Campos, G. C. & Molina, M. C. B. Food insecurity and nutritional status among older adults: a systematic review. Nutr. Rev. 80, 631–644 (2022). - 上下文:老年人的健康可能对营养环境特别敏感
FAO. Contribution of Terrestrial Animal Source Food to Healthy Diets for Improved Nutrition and Health Outcomes - An Evidence and Policy Overview on the State of Knowledge and Gaps. - 上下文:慢性营养不良主要发生在从受孕开始的前1000天
已核查结论清单
已核查内容1:该研究发表于《nature communications》杂志
已核查内容2:由悉尼大学查尔斯·珀金斯中心的Alistair Senior博士、博士候选人Caitlin Andrews及其团队开展
已核查内容3:他们研究了1961年至2018年期间101个国家的食品供应和人口统计数据
已核查内容4:并对数据进行了调整,以考虑人口规模和财富差异
已核查内容5:第一作者Caitlin Andrews表示:“在比较肉类与植物蛋白对人群健康影响方面,我们的研究呈现出复杂的局面。对于五岁以下儿童而言,供应大量动物蛋白和脂肪(如肉类、蛋类和乳制品)的食品系统降低了婴儿死亡率。然而,对于成年人来说,情况则相反,植物蛋白的摄入增加了整体预期寿命。”
待补充核查清单
待核查内容1:摄入更多植物蛋白(如鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆)的国家,成年人的预期寿命更长
待核查内容2:由悉尼大学查尔斯·珀金斯中心的Alistair Senior博士、博士候选人Caitlin Andrews及其团队开展
行动计划
Search
Caitlin J. Andrews Alistair Senior Nature Communications plant protein animal protein author list我需要查看更多关于这项研究的具体内容,特别是关于植物蛋白与寿命的关系。让我访问悉尼大学的新闻稿了解更多信息。
网页解析
https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/04/16/plant-based-diet-linked-to-longer-life.html这篇研究由悉尼大学的专家进行,发表在《自然通讯》杂志上,探讨了植物性蛋白质与寿命的关系。研究团队分析了1961-2018年间101个国家的食物供应和人口统计数据,研究蛋白质类型对寿命的影响。研究发现,消费更多植物性蛋白质(如鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆)的国家成年人预期寿命更长。然而,对5岁以下儿童而言,提供大量动物性蛋白质和脂肪的食物系统可降低婴儿死亡率。研究比较了不同食物系统的国家,包括动物性蛋白质消费较高的国家(如澳大利亚、美国)和植物性食品更普遍的地区(如巴基斯坦、印度尼西亚)。研究考虑了国家间的财富和人口规模差异,发现植物性蛋白质供应较高的国家(如印度)相对寿命更长。研究还指出,高水平的动物性蛋白质摄入与多种慢性疾病相关,而植物蛋白与较低的慢性疾病风险和总体死亡率相关。
研究作者:
研究的主要发现:
关于鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆的提及:
文章明确提到了这三种食物作为植物性蛋白质的例子:"A global study has shown that countries that consume more plant-based proteins – such as chickpeas, tofu and peas – have longer adult life expectancies."(一项全球研究表明,消费更多植物性蛋白质——如鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆——的国家成年人预期寿命更长。)这三种食物被作为植物性蛋白质的代表性例子提出。
图片title: 展示各种植物性和动物性蛋白质的图片,包括鱼、坚果和鸡蛋
content: 一张展示各种植物性和动物性蛋白质食物来源的图片,包括鱼类、坚果和鸡蛋等
source: Adobe Stock
link: https://www.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/corporate/images/news-and-opinion/news/2025/april/animal-vs-plant-based-protein---adobe-stock.jpeg
图片title: Charles Perkins中心的Alistair Senior博士,该研究的首席研究员
content: Alistair Senior博士的肖像照片,他是该研究的首席研究员
source: 悉尼大学
link: https://www.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/corporate/images/research/sydney-horizon-fellowships/alistair_senior_science1.jpg
我需要查看原始研究论文的更多细节,特别是关于作者信息和研究方法。让我访问Nature Communications上的原始论文。
这篇发表在Nature上的研究论文探讨了动物蛋白(ABP)和植物蛋白(PBP)供应与年龄特异性死亡率(ASM)之间的关系。研究使用了营养几何框架(GFN)分析了来自101个国家1961-2018年间的数据,包括联合国粮农组织(FAO)的食物平衡表、人类死亡率数据库的生命表数据、麦迪逊项目数据库的经济统计数据以及联合国人口司的人口估计。研究发现,全球范围内ABP和PBP供应量趋于收敛,总蛋白供应量随时间增加主要归因于ABP增加。经济财富与总蛋白供应量呈正相关,GDP较低地区PBP比例更高。研究还发现脂肪供应量较低、碳水化合物供应量较高的地区PBP比例更大。研究采用广义加性混合模型(GAMM)分析了蛋白质供应与5岁和60岁存活率的关系,为理解营养环境如何影响不同年龄段人口健康提供了重要见解。
关于作者列表和机构:
在提供的网页内容中没有直接列出论文的完整作者列表和作者机构。这部分内容可能在论文的其他部分(如标题页或致谢部分),但在当前提供的引言部分中未包含这些信息。
关于植物蛋白的例子:
论文确实提到了植物蛋白的例子。在引言的第四段中,明确提到:"另一方面,植物蛋白来源,如豆类(legumes)、坚果(nuts)和全谷物(whole grains),与慢性疾病和总体死亡率风险降低有关[18,21]。"这里提到了豆类(legumes)作为植物蛋白的例子,但并未具体提及鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆。
论文还在讨论"蓝区"(长寿社区)时提到这些地区的饮食"以植物性食物为主,动物蛋白含量低",但同样没有具体提到鹰嘴豆、豆腐或豌豆。
总结来说,论文中提到了豆类(legumes)作为植物蛋白的一般例子,但没有具体提到鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆作为植物蛋白的具体例子。
我需要获取更多关于论文作者的信息。让我查看PubMed上的信息。
该网页显示的是一篇题为"SENTIERI - 国家优先污染场地居民流行病学研究。第六次报告"的意大利语学术论文信息。该论文发表于2023年1-4月的《Epidemiol Prev》期刊第47卷第1-2期增刊1,页码为1-286,DOI为10.19191/EP23.1-2-S1.003,PMID为36825373。论文由Zona A等人撰写,并有"Gruppo di lavoro SENTIERI 2019-2022"(SENTIERI工作组2019-2022)参与。网页还显示了另一篇相关论文"The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health"的链接,该论文由Landrigan PJ等多位作者撰写,发表于《Ann Glob Health》期刊。
关于第一篇论文"SENTIERI - Epidemiological Study of Residents in National Priority Contaminated Sites. Sixth Report"的作者信息:
网页中没有明确列出这些作者所属的具体机构信息。
关于第二篇论文"The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health"的作者信息:
同样,网页中也没有提供这些作者的机构信息。
网页内容中未提供任何图片。
已核查结论清单
已核查内容1:该研究发表于《nature communications》杂志
已核查内容2:由悉尼大学查尔斯·珀金斯中心的Alistair Senior博士、博士候选人Caitlin Andrews及其团队开展
已核查内容3:他们研究了1961年至2018年期间101个国家的食品供应和人口统计数据
已核查内容4:并对数据进行了调整,以考虑人口规模和财富差异
已核查内容5:第一作者Caitlin Andrews表示:“在比较肉类与植物蛋白对人群健康影响方面,我们的研究呈现出复杂的局面。对于五岁以下儿童而言,供应大量动物蛋白和脂肪(如肉类、蛋类和乳制品)的食品系统降低了婴儿死亡率。然而,对于成年人来说,情况则相反,植物蛋白的摄入增加了整体预期寿命。”
待补充核查清单
待核查内容1:摄入更多植物蛋白(如鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆)的国家,成年人的预期寿命更长
行动计划
本文探讨了植物蛋白(PBP)与动物蛋白(ABP)供应对人类年龄特异性死亡率的影响。研究使用几何营养框架(GFN)分析了101个国家1961-2018年的数据,包括联合国粮农组织的食物平衡表、人类死亡率数据库的生命表和经济统计数据。结果显示,全球蛋白质供应趋势呈现收敛,总蛋白供应量随时间增加,主要归因于ABP增加。研究发现GDP较低地区PBP比例更高,而随着GDP增长至约12,000美元/人时ABP比例增加。分析表明,脂肪供应较低和碳水化合物供应较高的地区PBP比例更大。研究采用广义加性混合模型(GAMM)分析了蛋白质供应与5岁和60岁生存率的关系,将数据按性别分为四个子集进行统计建模,以评估营养环境对不同年龄段人口健康的影响。
关于植物蛋白的例子:
关于植物蛋白与成年人寿命的关系:
文章指出植物蛋白与动物蛋白对死亡率的影响不同:"At the dietary level, the associations between protein and mortality also appear to vary depending on the source, with ABP potentially having a greater impact on mortality than PBP sources"(在饮食水平上,蛋白质与死亡率的关联似乎因来源而异,动物蛋白可能比植物蛋白对死亡率有更大影响)。
研究表明植物蛋白与慢性疾病和总体死亡率风险降低相关:"plant protein sources, such as legumes, nuts, and whole grains, have been associated with a lower risk of chronic diseases and overall mortality"。
文章提到以植物为主的饮食是长寿社区("蓝区")的关键共同特征:"Researchers have proposed that a predominantly plant-based diet is one of the key common denominators contributing to the extended vitality and longevity observed in long-lived communities, also known as 'blue zones'"。
关于术语使用:
文章没有使用"life expectancy"(预期寿命)这一术语,而是使用了"survivorship"(生存率)、"mortality"(死亡率)和"longevity"(长寿)等术语来描述寿命相关概念。
具体来说,文章使用了"survivorship at ages 5 and 60 (l₅ and l₆₀, i.e., the proportion of a cohort still alive at ages 5 and 60)"作为早期和晚期生存的标志,来评估年龄特异性死亡率(ASM)。
文章还使用了"extended vitality and longevity"(延长的活力和长寿)来描述长寿社区的特征。
Crippa, M. et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Food 2, 198–209 (2021). - 上下文:讨论食物系统对温室气体排放的贡献
Huang, J. et al. Association between plant and animal protein intake and overall and cause-specific mortality. JAMA Intern. Med. 180, 1173–1184 (2020). - 上下文:讨论植物蛋白与动物蛋白摄入与总体和特定原因死亡率的关联
Sun, Y. et al. Association of major dietary protein sources with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: prospective cohort study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 10, e015553 (2021). - 上下文:讨论主要膳食蛋白质来源与全因和特定原因死亡率的关联
Aune, D. Plant foods, antioxidant biomarkers, and the risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality: a review of the evidence. Adv. Nutr. 10, S404–S421 (2019). - 上下文:讨论植物食品、抗氧化生物标志物与心血管疾病、癌症和死亡率风险的关系
Buettner, D. & Skemp, S. Blue zones: lessons from the world's longest lived. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 10, 318–321 (2016). - 上下文:讨论"蓝区"中长寿人群的特点
Chacón, A. M., Jiménez, C. C. & Campos, H. Dietary habits and lifestyle among long-lived residents from the Nicoya Peninsula of Costa Rica. Rev. Hispanoam. de. Cienc. de. la Salud (RHCS) 3, 53–60 (2017). - 上下文:讨论哥斯达黎加尼科亚半岛长寿居民的饮食习惯和生活方式
Virtanen, H. E. K. et al. Dietary proteins and protein sources and risk of death: the Kuopio Ischaemic heart disease risk factor study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 109, 1462–1471 (2019). - 上下文:讨论膳食蛋白质和蛋白质来源与死亡风险的关系
Simpson, S. J. et al. The geometric framework for nutrition as a tool in precision medicine. Nutr. Healthy Aging 4, 217–226 (2017). - 上下文:讨论几何营养框架作为精准医学工具的应用
Gage, T. B. & O'Connor, K. Nutrition and the variation in level and age patterns of mortality. 1994. Hum. Biol. 81, 551–574 (2009). - 上下文:讨论营养与死亡率水平和年龄模式变化的关系
Murray, C. J. L., Ahmad, O. B., Lopez, A. D. & Salomon, J. A. WHO System of Model Life Tables. - 上下文:讨论世界卫生组织提出的模型生命表方法
无与问题有关的其他图片。
我需要继续查找更多关于这项研究的信息,特别是关于植物蛋白与寿命的关系。让我查看悉尼大学的新闻稿,看看是否有更多细节。
网页解析
https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/04/16/plant-based-diet-linked-to-longer-life.html这篇新闻稿报道了悉尼大学的一项全球研究,发现食用更多植物蛋白的国家成年人预期寿命更长。研究由Charles Perkins中心的Alistair Senior博士和博士候选人Caitlin Andrews领导,分析了1961-2018年间101个国家的食物供应和人口数据,考虑了人口规模和财富因素。研究结果显示,对5岁以下儿童而言,动物蛋白和脂肪(如肉类、鸡蛋和乳制品)可降低婴儿死亡率;而对成年人来说,植物蛋白则增加了整体预期寿命。研究比较了动物蛋白消费较高的国家(如澳大利亚、美国)和植物性食品消费更普遍的地区(如巴基斯坦、印度尼西亚)。高水平的动物蛋白摄入,特别是加工肉类,长期以来与心血管疾病、2型糖尿病和某些癌症相关。而植物蛋白(包括豆类、坚果和全谷物)则与较低的慢性疾病风险和总体死亡率相关。
新闻稿中确实提到了'chickpeas'(鹰嘴豆)、'tofu'(豆腐)和'peas'(豌豆)作为植物蛋白的例子。在文章开头部分明确指出:"A global study has shown that countries that consume more plant-based proteins – such as chickpeas, tofu and peas – have longer adult life expectancies."(一项全球研究表明,消费更多植物蛋白——如鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆——的国家成年人预期寿命更长。)这一表述在文章第二段中被重复,强调了这三种食物作为植物蛋白的代表性例子。
关于植物蛋白与成年人寿命的关系,新闻稿中描述如下:
Nature Communications - 上下文:"Published in Nature Communications, Dr Alistair Senior..."(研究发表在Nature Communications期刊)
Dr Alistair Senior - 上下文:"Dr Alistair Senior, PhD candidate Caitlin Andrews and their team..."(研究的主要调查者之一)
Charles Perkins Centre - 上下文:"...and their team in the Charles Perkins Centre studied food supply..."(研究团队所属机构)
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58475-1 - 上下文:"DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58475-1"(研究论文的DOI链接)
图片标题: A picture showing a range of plant- and animal-based protein including fish, nuts and eggs
内容: 展示各种植物和动物蛋白来源,包括鱼类、坚果和鸡蛋
来源: 未知(可能是Adobe Stock,根据图片链接推测)
链接: https://www.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/corporate/images/news-and-opinion/news/2025/april/animal-vs-plant-based-protein---adobe-stock.jpeg
图片标题: Dr Alistair Senior from the Charles Perkins Centre, the lead investigator for the research
内容: 显示研究的首席调查员Alistair Senior博士的照片
来源: 悉尼大学
链接: https://www.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/corporate/images/research/sydney-horizon-fellowships/alistair_senior_science1.jpg
我现在已经收集了足够的信息来完成核查。让我提供最终答案。
本次核查共涉及6项内容,其中5项经证据证实可靠,1项部分可靠。
核查发现,用户提交的报告内容在主要事实方面基本准确,包括研究发表期刊、研究团队成员、研究时间范围、数据调整方法以及第一作者的引述等。唯一存在部分偏差的是关于植物蛋白例子的表述——原始研究论文中并未具体提及"鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆"作为植物蛋白的例子,这些具体食物例子仅出现在悉尼大学的新闻稿中,可能是为了便于公众理解而添加的。此外,原研究使用"survivorship"(生存率)而非"life expectancy"(预期寿命)作为主要指标,但这一差异在科普传播中可接受。
总体而言,该报告适合用于科普传播,但在学术引用时应注意区分原始研究与新闻稿的表述差异。
原文陈述 | 可靠性分析 | 证据 |
---|---|---|
该研究发表于《nature communications》杂志 | 可靠 已确认该研究确实发表在Nature Communications期刊上,发表时间为2025年4月11日。 | "Associations between national plant-based vs animal-based protein supplies and age-specific mortality in human populations" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58475-1(2025年4月11日) "A global study by University of Sydney experts, published in Nature Communications, has explored the impact of plant-based versus animal-based protein consumption on human longevity." https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/04/16/plant-based-diet-linked-to-longer-life.html(2025年4月16日) |
由悉尼大学查尔斯·珀金斯中心的Alistair Senior博士、博士候选人Caitlin Andrews及其团队开展 | 可靠 已确认研究由悉尼大学查尔斯·珀金斯中心的Alistair Senior博士和博士候选人Caitlin Andrews领导,团队还包括其他成员。 | "The study was led by first author and PhD candidate Caitlin Andrews and senior researcher Dr Alistair Senior from the University of Sydney's Charles Perkins Centre." https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/04/16/plant-based-diet-linked-to-longer-life.html(2025年4月16日) "Authors. Caitlin J Andrews, David Raubenheimer, Stephen J Simpson, Alistair M Senior. Affiliations. 1 Charles Perkins ..." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40210635/(2025年4月11日) |
他们研究了1961年至2018年期间101个国家的食品供应和人口统计数据 | 可靠 原始论文和悉尼大学新闻稿均确认研究涵盖了1961年至2018年期间101个国家的数据。 | "Our dataset comprises complete country- and year-specific entries from 101 different countries, spanning 1961–2018." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58475-1(2025年4月11日) "The team analysed food supply and demographic data from 1961-2018 across 101 countries..." https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/04/16/plant-based-diet-linked-to-longer-life.html(2025年4月16日) |
并对数据进行了调整,以考虑人口规模和财富差异 | 可靠 研究确实对数据进行了调整,以考虑人口规模和财富差异等因素的影响。 | "We explored interactions between macronutrient supplies, time, country, and wealth, with statistical corrections to control for possible confounding by such factors." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58475-1(2025年4月11日) "...adjusting for factors like population size and wealth..." https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/04/16/plant-based-diet-linked-to-longer-life.html(2025年4月16日) |
摄入更多植物蛋白(如鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆)的国家,成年人的预期寿命更长 | 部分可靠 研究确实发现植物蛋白摄入与成年人生存率提高相关,但原始研究论文中未具体提及"鹰嘴豆、豆腐和豌豆"作为例子,这些具体食物例子仅出现在悉尼大学的新闻稿中。此外,原研究使用"survivorship"(生存率)而非"life expectancy"(预期寿命)作为指标。 | "On the other hand, plant protein sources, such as legumes, nuts, and whole grains, have been associated with a lower risk of chronic diseases and overall mortality" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58475-1(2025年4月11日) "A global study has shown that countries that consume more plant-based proteins – such as chickpeas, tofu and peas – have longer adult life expectancies." https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/04/16/plant-based-diet-linked-to-longer-life.html(2025年4月16日) |
第一作者Caitlin Andrews表示:"在比较肉类与植物蛋白对人群健康影响方面,我们的研究呈现出复杂的局面。对于五岁以下儿童而言,供应大量动物蛋白和脂肪(如肉类、蛋类和乳制品)的食品系统降低了婴儿死亡率。然而,对于成年人来说,情况则相反,植物蛋白的摄入增加了整体预期寿命。" | 可靠 引述内容与悉尼大学官方新闻稿中Caitlin Andrews的原话完全一致。 | "First author Caitlin Andrews said: 'Our study suggests a mixed picture when it comes to comparing the health impacts of meat- versus plant-based proteins on population health. For children under five, food systems that provide ample animal-based proteins and fats, such as meat, eggs and dairy, reduce infant mortality. However, for adults, the tables turn, with plant-based proteins increasing overall life expectancy.'" https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/04/16/plant-based-diet-linked-to-longer-life.html(2025年4月16日) |