login
苏超上座率为何反超中超?
2025/07/24·StepFun can make mistakes, check important info.
苏超为什么上座率比中超还高?
Reason
来源
苏超上座率已压倒中超,中国职业足球该“买块豆腐撞死”?
职业中超上座率输给业余的苏超,还不如买块豆腐撞死算了!上座率高,离不开低票价引流 关于苏超为啥那么火爆,不管是体育行家、经济专家还是社会学家,基本达成了以下三点共识:“一城一队”模式,让江苏十三太保成员找到城市归属感,观赛成为情绪宣泄出口;形散神不散的“苏超梗”,在社交媒体时代引发全民流量狂欢;文旅商体展深度融合,主打城市品牌形象营销。江苏十三太保大多数推行低价球票策略,淮安的足球文旅套餐票因为价格相对较贵,被部分网友...
https://s2.zimgs.cn/ims?kt=url&at=smstruct&key=aHR0cHM6Ly9ndy5hbGljZG4uY29tL0wxLzcyMy8xNTU5MDk2OTU3LzNjL2M0LzJhLzNjYzQyYTVlZjVlYzNkMzRiOWYwYmUwZjFjNDVhYzZiLmljbw==&sign=yx:4ux0Ov3IaZW0IBYarBCuQnARQ74=&tv=400_400
腾讯
苏超这么火,中超真就不行了吗?
苏超与中超的对比主要集中在五个方面:上座率、赞助商、竞技水平、拉动异地消费能力以及比赛的纯粹性。二者各有所长,尤其苏超,成长速度惊人,甚至被部分网友戏称为“中国足球第一联赛”。在流量定义一切的时代里,再不着边际的论断都可以找到支撑依据。可是,我们终归还要回到专业本身,用专业视角去解读苏超与中超的存在方式。也许无法判定谁好谁坏,但至少可以得出这样的结论—足球在中国拥有巨大市场。过去30...
https://s2.zimgs.cn/ims?kt=url&at=smstruct&key=aHR0cHM6Ly9ndy5hbGljZG4uY29tL0wxLzcyMy8xNTg0NDI0NTIyL2U2LzZjL2VhL2U2NmNlYTU0YTEwZDEzMzZjODhiNGMwMjkxMTRhOThjLmljbw==&sign=yx:72z_oIinDw9pBPBAn9IuCIeCKNA=&tv=400_400
腾讯
苏超上座率逆袭中超:地方联赛的崛起与启示
这一数据不仅超过了同期中超联赛的场均上座人数,更让苏超这一地方联赛成为了足球界关注的焦点。苏超上座率飙升,创历史新高 苏超自2025年5月10日开赛以来,迅速出圈,上座率一路飙升。前两轮战罢,12场比赛场均观众达8798人,超过同期中甲联赛场均6467人的上座率。而到了第四轮,上座率更是达到了惊人的25802人,场均观众人数首次超过中超联赛。在第四...
https://s2.zimgs.cn/ims?kt=url&at=smstruct&key=aHR0cHM6Ly9ndy5hbGljZG4uY29tL0wxLzcyMy8xNTYyODEzMjI0L2I0LzExL2Y3L2I0MTFmN2ExMGZlNzgxYzNhNjMwYzYxYWU2NmE0ODY2LnBuZw==&sign=yx:VnmFtuBPyzBrSG70neamT35QLU4=&tv=400_400
今日头条
8 web pages
腾讯
腾讯
今日头条
今日头条
腾讯
搜狐网
今日头条
腾讯
思考过程

Okay, the user is asking why the Suzhou Super League (苏超) has a higher attendance rate than the Chinese Super League (中超). Let me go through the search results I have to find the key reasons.

First, looking at the data, SuCha's average attendance in the fourth round was 25,802, surpassing the Chinese Super League's average of 24,756. That's a significant difference. The articles mention several factors contributing to this phenomenon.

One major factor is the low ticket prices. SuCha teams like连云港 and 宿迁 offer free tickets, while others like 南通 and 徐州 charge only 1 yuan. Even bigger cities like 南京 have tickets as low as 30 yuan. This affordability draws huge crowds, especially when compared to中超's higher prices - Beijing Guoan's cheapest ticket is 260 yuan. The cheap tickets act as a "traffic hook," similar to free eggs given to retirees, to get people in the door.

The tournament's structure also plays a role. It's branded as江苏省城市足球联赛, pitting different cities against each other. This "one city, one team" approach creates strong local rivalries and gives fans a sense of urban identity. The "江苏十三太保" meme has been cleverly used in marketing, generating buzz on social media.

There's also a strong cultural and tourism integration. Matches are scheduled during peak tourism seasons, with special train services and local food markets around the stadiums. For example, in Huai'an, they set up a festival-like market with local snacks. This transforms a football match into a full day-out experience for families.

From the funding side, SuCha attracted 19 sponsors quickly, including big names like JD.com and KFC, totaling around 50 million yuan. This financial backing allows them to maintain low ticket prices while still making money through ancillary consumption.

In contrast, the Chinese Super League has higher operational costs and relies more on ticket sales. Their fan base is concentrated in a few strong teams like Dalian and Beijing, whereas SuCha has more balanced attendance across all matches. Also, SuCha benefits from government support, being part of Jiangsu's cultural development plans.

The media coverage difference is stark too. SuCha leveraged trending topics and social media effectively, while中超 has broader but more scattered coverage. The amateur nature of SuCha also gives it a "grassroots" appeal that resonates in today's digital age.

Putting it all together, SuCha's success comes from smart pricing, cultural relevance, tourism integration, strong sponsorship, and social media savviness. It shows how a regional league can thrive by understanding its local context, unlike the more commercialized top-tier league.

苏超(江苏省城市足球联赛)上座率超过中超(中国足球协会超级联赛),是政策支持、低价策略、文化认同、文旅融合与社交媒体效应等多重因素共同作用的结果,具体分析如下:

1. 票价:极致低价引流,“免费/1元票”击穿消费门槛

苏超采用**“地板价”策略**,用超低票价突破大众消费心理防线:

  • 连云港、宿迁主场免费开放;苏州主场仅需1分钱(还配套免费公交专线);南通、徐州、盐城、无锡等城市票价区间为1元 - 10元;常州9.9元球票送萝卜干炒饭,南京主场也仅30元。
  • 中超则走“高价路线”,北京国安最低票价260元(2025赛季),多数球队票价50元起步(部分场次1380元封顶)。相比之下,苏超票价仅为中超的1/10 - 1/30,近乎“零门槛”让普通市民愿意走进球场,为“热闹”买单。314

2. 情感:城市荣誉绑定,“江苏十三太保”唤醒归属感

苏超以**“一城一队”的地域绑定**重构情感连接:

  • 将赛事包装为江苏13市的“城市实力竞赛”,球迷支持主队时,附加“为家乡站台”的集体荣誉感。“江苏十三太保”的网络梗(省内城市竞逐发展的戏称)被巧妙转化为赛事话题,让“看球=支持城市”的认知深入基层。13
  • 反观中超,球迷情感更集中于少数传统强队(如大连、北京、成都),部分球队(如武汉三镇主场仅8441人)因成绩或运营问题,难以激活广泛地域认同,整体上座“冷热不均”。52

3. 模式:文旅商体展融合,赛事成“城市嘉年华”

苏超跳出“纯体育”逻辑,打造**“赛事+旅游+消费”的复合型场景**:

  • 赛事与暑期旅游旺季深度绑定,开通“球迷高铁专列”(如南京-淮安专线);球场周边设“城市市集”(如淮安奥体中心的“美食+购物+互动”集市),把看球变成“周末短途游”。13
  • 这种“以球促旅、以旅活商”的模式,让赛事成为城市形象的“流量入口”。而中超偏重竞技属性,商业化与文旅融合程度弱于苏超,难以提供“边看球边体验城市文化”的复合价值。37

4. 传播:社交裂变造势,“业余赛”的逆袭叙事引爆话题

苏超的**“草根逆袭”标签**天然适配社交媒体传播逻辑:

  • 从“社区大爷踢野球”的调侃,到“单场破6万观众(南京vs苏州)”的爆点,赛事借“业余赛反超职业赛”的反差感,制造“打脸质疑者”“真香现场”等话题,在短视频、朋友圈快速裂变。媒体人也借势讨论“足球要从基层热闹开始”,进一步推高热度。468
  • 中超作为职业赛事,传播更侧重赛事结果、球星动态,缺乏“逆袭叙事”的戏剧性,话题延展性弱于苏超。

5. 政策与运营:顶层设计+创新执行,托举“全民参与”

苏超的崛起背后是政策赋能+灵活运营的双轮驱动:

  • 政策端:江苏省将“城市足球联赛”写入政府工作报告(2024 - 2025年重点推进“三大球振兴”),从场地、资金、宣传层面全域支持。3
  • 运营端:首创“啦啦队前期撑场面→票价平民化→赞助商饱和式涌入(19家,赞助超5000万元)→流量反哺衍生消费”的闭环,用商业逻辑反推“全民参与”。而中超受制于职业俱乐部高成本、高票价、安保/场地合规性等约束,在“普惠性”上难及苏超。25

启示:苏超给中国足球的“破局点”

苏超证明:足球的根基在基层参与感,而非职业光环。中超可借鉴“低票价锚定大众、地域文化赋能、文旅场景嫁接”,补足“冷热不均、情感连接弱、商业单一”的短板——毕竟,“让普通市民愿意为足球推掉麻将、走进球场”,才是足球扎根土壤的真谛。41

(注:苏超属省级业余联赛,与中超职业体系定位不同,但“上座率反超”折射的运营逻辑,对职业联赛同样有镜鉴价值。)